<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dear John</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickflickreviews.net/dear-john/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/dear-john</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews by Women For Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:02:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenna</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/dear-john/comment-page-1#comment-1148</link>
		<dc:creator>jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2480#comment-1148</guid>
		<description>hahahahahaha. that&#039;s ironic and hilarious. we should all be so proud of our hometown newspaper. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahahahahaha. that&#8217;s ironic and hilarious. we should all be so proud of our hometown newspaper. <img src='http://www.chickflickreviews.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kylie</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/dear-john/comment-page-1#comment-1141</link>
		<dc:creator>Kylie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 06:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2480#comment-1141</guid>
		<description>Guess who made yet another mistake!?
Yeah that&#039;s right, the Ottawa paper did!! 
I was reading this review at work today and it says Jenna wrote it...And I see bri did.. 
Big shocker huh!!!??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guess who made yet another mistake!?<br />
Yeah that&#8217;s right, the Ottawa paper did!!<br />
I was reading this review at work today and it says Jenna wrote it&#8230;And I see bri did..<br />
Big shocker huh!!!??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenna</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/dear-john/comment-page-1#comment-1139</link>
		<dc:creator>jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 23:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2480#comment-1139</guid>
		<description>i, too, want to gag at the thought of mr. sparks, a feeling that is only enhanced by his over-popularity in the bookstore where i work (i honestly almost vomited when i saw the new movie cover for his book &quot;the last song&quot; featuring that little brat, miley cyrus!). but i am glad that you people were able to come away from this without wanting to gouge your eyes out (like we all did for &quot;leap year&quot;...haha).

i also enjoy amanda seyfried, and hoped that this movie would be just a small accident in her acting career...but then i remembered that her next film, &quot;letters to juliet&quot; (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0892318/), due out in may, has a strangely similar plot and appears to be just another 3-star film. i hope that this bright young star gets back on track to 4- and 5-stars...soon! good review. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i, too, want to gag at the thought of mr. sparks, a feeling that is only enhanced by his over-popularity in the bookstore where i work (i honestly almost vomited when i saw the new movie cover for his book &#8220;the last song&#8221; featuring that little brat, miley cyrus!). but i am glad that you people were able to come away from this without wanting to gouge your eyes out (like we all did for &#8220;leap year&#8221;&#8230;haha).</p>
<p>i also enjoy amanda seyfried, and hoped that this movie would be just a small accident in her acting career&#8230;but then i remembered that her next film, &#8220;letters to juliet&#8221; (<a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0892318/" rel="nofollow">http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0892318/</a>), due out in may, has a strangely similar plot and appears to be just another 3-star film. i hope that this bright young star gets back on track to 4- and 5-stars&#8230;soon! good review. <img src='http://www.chickflickreviews.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/dear-john/comment-page-1#comment-1138</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2480#comment-1138</guid>
		<description>When I think Nicholas Sparks I think &quot;GAG-O-RAMA!&quot;  This film wasn&#039;t toooo bad to sit through, I must say.  I completely agree w/ your synopsis.  I am not a fan of romantic mush---but &quot;Dear John&quot; was quite enjoyable.  I also enjoyed the fact that this story revolved around the guy.  I was shocked at some surprises near the end and I can&#039;t say that I was entirely happy about the ending, but overall I enjoyed myself.  

Kudos to Richard Jenkins!!  His character was most memorable and phenomenally acted.  I believe most Nicholas Sparks fans will not be disappointed with this one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I think Nicholas Sparks I think &#8220;GAG-O-RAMA!&#8221;  This film wasn&#8217;t toooo bad to sit through, I must say.  I completely agree w/ your synopsis.  I am not a fan of romantic mush&#8212;but &#8220;Dear John&#8221; was quite enjoyable.  I also enjoyed the fact that this story revolved around the guy.  I was shocked at some surprises near the end and I can&#8217;t say that I was entirely happy about the ending, but overall I enjoyed myself.  </p>
<p>Kudos to Richard Jenkins!!  His character was most memorable and phenomenally acted.  I believe most Nicholas Sparks fans will not be disappointed with this one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

