<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherlock Holmes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chickflickreviews.net/sherlock-holmes/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/sherlock-holmes</link>
	<description>Movie Reviews by Women For Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 00:15:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2075#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Hi Tori!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tori!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tori</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Tori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2075#comment-844</guid>
		<description>I saw this when it opened on Christmas day.  I have to say that while I was already optimistic about the film, I was still really surprised by how good it was.  It was really well written to start with, and the cast was just fantastic together.  And I love how they made Holmes a really quirky and somewhat socially awkward genius, instead of the more prim and proper Sherlock I remember from the stories.  Can&#039;t wait for the next Holmes adventure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw this when it opened on Christmas day.  I have to say that while I was already optimistic about the film, I was still really surprised by how good it was.  It was really well written to start with, and the cast was just fantastic together.  And I love how they made Holmes a really quirky and somewhat socially awkward genius, instead of the more prim and proper Sherlock I remember from the stories.  Can&#8217;t wait for the next Holmes adventure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candice Frederick</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>Candice Frederick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2075#comment-836</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m actually surprised to hear this was good. The trailer doesn&#039;t tell me much but I loved your review of it. Maybe I&#039;ll check out the movie ove Christmas break</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually surprised to hear this was good. The trailer doesn&#8217;t tell me much but I loved your review of it. Maybe I&#8217;ll check out the movie ove Christmas break</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://www.chickflickreviews.net/sherlock-holmes/comment-page-1#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chickflickreviews.net/?p=2075#comment-835</guid>
		<description>ginger dwarf?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ginger dwarf?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
